CHANGE EQUALS SOCIALISM - NATIONALIZATION

 

 

YOUR_WORLD.gifCHANGE_=.gif

 

AMERICA - YOUR CHANGING WORLD

Democratic Progressive Caucus United States Congress:

 

"The members of the Progressive Caucus share a common belief in the principles of social and economic justice, non-discrimination and tolerance in America…”

 

Democratic Socialists:

 

“Believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.”

 

Marxism:

 

Democracy is the road to socialism

 

The socialist slogan is "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work."

 

The communist slogan is "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

 

Communism, which evolves peacefully from socialism, is a classless society under which the state will wither away.

 

Class hatred is a good thing and class collaboration is a bad thing.

 

Full Marxism in power has been a disaster in every country where it has gained power.

 

Leninism:

 

Democracy is indispensable to socialism

 

The exploiters need to be liquidated as a class. This ambiguous phrase sometimes just meant taking their property and exiling them, but often enough it meant killing them and sometimes their families. ** Liquidating the capitalists as a class made the country poorer.

 

AM-COMM.jpg

 

How Capitalism Will Save Us

Steve Forbes 10.22.08, 6:00 PM ET

Forbes Magazine dated November 10, 2008

 

Some liberal political activists are advocating using Washington's new powers to pursue other agendas, such as forcing tighter emissions curbs or mandating costly health insurance coverage. New attempts to restrict corporate pay, at least in some sectors, is a given--overlooking the unintended side effects of Bill Clinton's attempt to limit CEO pay packages back in 1993. (The deductibility of CEOs' salaries was capped, which led companies to use stock options as never before.) Protectionists are renewing calls for trade restrictions in the name of consumer safety and promoting "better" labor and environmental standards. Politically resurgent labor unions and other activists will push for rules on who sits on corporate boards to "better represent consumers and investors." They want an implicit veto power over the policies of publicly held companies. They're also ready to remove barriers, such as the secret ballot, in order to coerce workers into joining unions.

 

What CHANGE will usher in – socialism.

 

 

Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly. Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution which represents the transitional stage between capitalism and communism.     (Wikipedia) 

 

But can you recognize socialism when you see it and how is it different than what our Founders envisioned?

 

What is capitalism?

Laissez faire capitalism means the complete separation of economy and state, just like the separation of church and state. Capitalism is the social system based upon private ownership of the means of production which entails a completely uncontrolled and unregulated economy where all land is privately owned. But the separation of the state and the economy is not a primary, it is only an aspect of the premise that capitalism is based upon: individual rights. Capitalism is the only politico-economic system based on the doctrine of individual rights. This means that capitalism recognizes that each and every person is the owner of his own life, and has the right to live his life in any manner he chooses as long as he does not violate the rights of others.

 

What is the opposite of capitalism?

Statism, in any form. (Nationalization)

 

Statism is the concentration of power in the state at the expense of individual freedom. Capitalism is the only system which protects individual rights and freedom, but the variety of political systems which violate individual freedom are numerous: socialism, communism, fascism, Nazism, absolute monarchies, military dictatorships, theocracies, or the welfare state are all systems which infringe upon individual rights, which means they institutionalize the initiation of force against their citizens.

 

It must be realized that there are only two fundamental political philosophies: those who are for freedom and individual rights and those who are against them. The types of political systems who are against freedom and individual rights are numerous, for there are many ways to violate the rights of man, but there is only one political-economic philosophy which upholds that the rights of man are absolute and immutable -- capitalism.

 

Is capitalism a just social system?

Yes.

 

In fact, capitalism is the complete embodiment of social justice. In social or political context justice means that every person gets no more, and no less, than what he gains through voluntary association with other men. A capitalist society is a just society because all individuals are considered equal under the law. Capitalism recognizes that it is just for a man to keep what he has earned and that it is unjust for a man, or group of men, to have the right to what other people have earned. Since all people must live independently under capitalism, all of the material values that a person acquires must be earned. Thus, the expression of social justice under capitalism is that what a man earns is directly proportional to what he produces, with no antitrust laws or progressive income taxes stifling his achievement for the sole fact the he did achieve. All other forms of government, such as the welfare state, institutionalize injustice by legally expropriating the property of some men and giving it to others.

 

Many people have trouble accepting that capitalism is a just system because of the existence of economic inequality. It is observed that famous celebrities and sports stars have very large incomes for work that is perceived as trivial, and that many hard working people make incomes which pale in comparison for jobs that are perceived to be a greater benefit to society. What people must realize is that it is perfectly just for a superstar athlete, even with little or no education, to make a hundred times the income of a scientist who has a Ph.D. and works much longer and strenuous hours. Why? Because the athlete creates enormous profits through ticket sales and product endorsements whereas the scientist generates very little revenue through his research. That is, each of them deserves what they earn, and what they earn is the result of how much wealth each of them creates (Incidentally, this is not to say that the athlete is morally superior to the scientist because he is wealthier). Since each man has the right to the product of his labor, it is completely just for the disparity in incomes to exist, and the only injustice to occur would be for the government to take money from the athlete and give it to those who supposedly deserve it on the basis of their "need."

 

What is happening today?

 

Nationalization which is the act of taking an industry or assets into the public ownership of a national government. Nationalization usually refers to private assets, but may also mean assets owned by lower levels of government, such as municipalities. The opposite of nationalization is usually privatization or de-nationalization, but may also be municipalization. A renationalization occurs when state-owned assets are privatized and later nationalized again, often when a different political party or faction is in power. A renationalization process may also be called reverse privatization.

The motives for nationalization are political as well as economic. It is a central theme of certain brands of 'state socialist' policy that the means of production, distribution and exchange, should be owned by the state on behalf of the people. Socialists believe that public ownership enables people to exercise full democratic control over the means whereby they earn their living and provides an effective means of redistributing wealth and income more equitably.

Nationalized industries, charged with operating in the public interest, may be under strong political and social pressures to give much more attention to externalities. They may be obliged to operate some loss making activities where social benefits are clearly greater than social costs - for example, rural, postal and transport services. As an instance, the United States Postal Service is guaranteed its nationalized status by the Constitution. The government has recognized these social obligations and, in some cases, provides subsidies for such non-commercial operations.

Since the nationalized industries are state owned, the government is responsible for meeting any debts incurred by these industries. The nationalized industries do not normally borrow from the domestic market other than for short-term borrowing.

Nationalization may occur with or without compensation to the former owners. If it takes place without compensation it is a case of expropriation. Nationalization is distinguished from property redistribution in that the government retains control of nationalized property. Some nationalizations take place when a government seizes property acquired illegally. For example, the French government seized the car-makers Renault because its owners had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers of France.

 

2001 In response to the September 11 attacks, the then-private airport security industry was nationalized and put under the authority of the Transportation Security Administration.

 

2008 In September 2008, the government initiated the nationalization of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. (Wikipedia)

 

"These are the times that try men's souls." - Thomas Paine, Founding Father.

This simple quotation from Founding Father Thomas Paine's The Crisis describes the beginnings of the American Revolution. Paine’s writings inspired great passion. He communicated the ideas of the Revolution to common farmers as easily as to intellectuals, creating prose that stirred the hearts of the fledgling United States. 

In 1776, he published Common Sense, a strong defense of American Independence from England.

In the Rights of Man (1791) Paine posits that popular political revolution is permissible when a government does not safeguard its people, their natural rights, and their national interests.

This might be Thomas Paine’s take on our Country today.

 

 

 

Read: Two Wolves and a Sheep

 

Can You Recognize a Marxist?

It’s a short walk from Communitarian to Communism and you can stop by Community along the way.

 

Pure Communism has never been implemented, it remains theoretical: Communism is, in Marxist theory, the end-state, or the result of state-socialism. The word is now mainly understood to refer to the political, economic, and social theory of Marxist thinkers, or life under conditions of Communist party rule.

 

The socialist want you to believe: “you are your Brother’s keeper”

I am not my brother’s keeper

And the LORD said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother's keeper?

Scripture in the Bible does not say you are.

Proposed fee on smelly cows, hogs angers farmers

By Bob Johnson, Associated Press Writer – Fri Dec 5,

Farmers so far are turning their noses up at the notion, which is one of several put forward by the Environmental Protection Agency after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that greenhouse gases emitted by belching and flatulence amounts to air pollution.

"This is one of the most ridiculous things the federal government has tried to do," said Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks, an outspoken opponent of the proposal.

It would require farms or ranches with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to pay an annual fee of about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of beef cattle and $20 for each hog.

The executive vice president of the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, Ken Hamilton, estimated the fee would cost owners of a modest-sized cattle ranch $30,000 to $40,000 a year. He said he has talked to a number of livestock owners about the proposals, and "all have said if the fees were carried out, it would bankrupt them."

"It makes perfect sense if you are looking for ways to cut down on meat consumption and recoup environmental losses," said Bruce Friedrich, a spokesman in Washington for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

And now for a world government

By Gideon Rachman

Published: December 8 2008  Financial Times

 

I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. I have never seen black helicopters hovering in the sky above Montana. But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

 

So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might.

 

UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

December 10, 2008

Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History'    

 

2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved

By Christopher Booker
Last Updated: 10:59AM GMT 28 Dec 2008

 

…on May 21, headed "Climate change threat to Alpine ski resorts" , reported that the entire Alpine "winter sports industry" could soon "grind to a halt for lack of snow". The second, on December 19, headed "The Alps have best snow conditions in a generation", reported that this winter's Alpine snowfalls "look set to beat all records by New Year's Day".

 

Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.

Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979
Michael Asher (Blog) - January 1, 2009 11:31 AM

Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Earth on the Brink of an Ice Age

1/11/09 Pravda-Ru

 

Long-term climate data collected from various sources shows a strong correlation with the three astronomical cycles which are together known as the Milankovich cycles. The three Milankovich cycles include the tilt of the earth, which varies over a 41,000 year period; the shape of the earth’s orbit, which changes over a period of 100,000 years; and the Precession of the Equinoxes, also known as the earth’s ‘wobble’, which gradually rotates the direction of the earth’s axis over a period of 26,000 years. According to the Milankovich theory of Ice Age causation, these three astronomical cycles, each of which effects the amount of solar radiation which reaches the earth, act together to produce the cycle of cold Ice Age maximums and warm interglacials.

 

January 19, 2009 – Somebody is lying to us!

 

You read: Study: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? - Warming Fears in 'Dustbin of History'  Next you read:  Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979 And now there is this:  January 18, 2009 Soaring carbon emissions are already causing ice-cap melting and threaten to trigger global flooding,…so who is lying?

 

Is it just a coincidence that the above article says Obama has just four years to save the world and that the UN’s plan for world socialism (Agenda 21) must be complete by 2012?

 

 

Georgia congressman warns of Obama dictatorship

 

"It may sound a bit crazy and off base, but the thing is, he's the one who proposed this national security force," Rep. Paul Broun said of Obama in an interview Monday with The Associated Press. "I'm just trying to bring attention to the fact that we may — may not, I hope not — but we may have a problem with that type of philosophy of radical socialism or Marxism."

 

February 10, 2009

Bloomberg News:

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan

 

Betsy McCaughey

(Hidden in the stimulus plan)

One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective.

 

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties.  “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time”

 

Health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

 

OBAMA-JOKER-150.jpg

Is this a face you can trust?

Obama’s real direction is easily found in past statements.  His real purpose for healthcare reform is to destroy the health insurance industry and have a single payer system,…the government. 

 

Obama climate czar has socialist ties

Group sees 'global governance' as solution

 

Until last week, Carol M. Browner, President-elect Barack Obama's pick as global warming czar, was listed as one of 14 leaders of a socialist group's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for "global governance" and says rich countries must shrink their economies to address climate change.

February 20, 2009

Transportation secretary says taxing how much we drive may replace gasoline tax

 

By JOAN LOWY

Associated Press Writer

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he wants to consider taxing motorists based on how many miles they drive rather than how much gasoline they burn — an idea that has angered drivers in some states where it has been proposed.

 

"We should look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually clocked on the number of miles that they traveled," the former Illinois Republican lawmaker said.

 

The system would require all cars and trucks be equipped with global satellite positioning technology, a transponder, a clock and other equipment to record how many miles a vehicle was driven, whether it was driven on highways or secondary roads, and even whether it was driven during peak traffic periods or off-peak hours.

 

The device would tally how much tax motorists owed depending upon their road use. Motorists would pay the amount owed when it was downloaded, probably at gas stations at first, but an alternative eventually would be needed.

 

June 26, 2009

The Climate Change Climate Change

 

Paul Sheehan, a noted Australian columnist -- and ardent global warming believer -- in April humbly pronounced it (a published book "Heaven and Earth," a damning critique of the "evidence" underpinning man-made global warming) “an evidence-based attack on conformity and orthodoxy, including my own, and a reminder to respect informed dissent and beware of ideology subverting evidence."

 

July 10,2009

Gore: U.S. Climate Bill Will Help Bring About 'Global Governance' 

Gore's call for “global governance” echoes former French President Jacques Chirac's call in 2000.

On November 20, 2000, then French President Chirac said during a speech at The Hague that the UN's Kyoto Protocol represented "the first component of an authentic global governance." READ: UN AGENDA 21 The blue print for one world governance

 

 

Middletown Home Page - Freedom 21 Lake County - Your Changing World

“THE INTERNET, THE LEAST EXPENSIVE WAY TO REACH THE WORLD”

“..one nation under God,..”

 

www.middletownca.com

www.sylvies-fashions.com  

www.socminco.com 

Site Page

 

All rights reserved on written material.  No part of any page may in anyway be used, copied or reproduced without

the written permission of middletownca.com © copyright 2008, 2009  

http://ctr.andale.com/cgi-bin/honesty-counter.cgi?df=gen.7628948.00003
Free counters provided by Andale