|
What is FREEDOM 21 LAKE COUNTY?
· It is an effort to counter United Nations Agenda 21 at our local level, especially
here in Lake County, CA.
· What is United Nations
Agenda 21?
· It is the United Nations plan for your
future in the 21st century being implemented by the U.N. Commission
on Sustainable Development
· Is Agenda 21 a bad thing?
· If you value freedom, liberty, private property
rights and the American way of life in general, then it is a bad thing.
· How can this U.N. Agenda
affect me, I’m an American?
· The United States of America has adopted
“Agenda 21” as policy for the future of our country. In 1992, then President George H. W. Bush
swore your allegiance to the United Nations. In 1993 by executive order,
then President William Jefferson Clinton established the President’s
Council on Sustainable Development.
Every government department was directed to establish
sustainable development. Today it
has all kinds of names like “Smart Growth” or "Shaping Our
Future" or "Regional Planning" or "New Urbanism"
or "Sustainable Development".
But no matter what the catchphrase is, what it really represents is
Central Planning and Social Engineering.
· Why haven’t I heard of this
before?
· You may not have heard the words “Agenda
21” but you’ve both heard and experienced Agenda 21 policy already.
· How?
· Agenda 21 is about control of your
life. It is accomplished through
adjusting your mind on social, economic and environmental issues over a
long period of time. Everyone
basically understands the environmental approach to control. Over a course of years you have watched
environmental issues trump private property rights. But under Agenda 21 you will even see
worse restrictions. The Supreme
Court’s ruling against private property rights (June 23, 2005) is Agenda 21
at work. Explaining implementation
of the social and economic issues is a little trickier. However, you have experienced political
correct speech which is a tentacle of social control and social
engineering. The most recent move
regarding economic engineering is the blatant attack on Wal-mart. Under Agenda 21, economic engineering
focuses on “localized entrepreneurialism”.
Their goal is to discourage capitalism even going so far as
recommending bartering for goods and services.
· Has the main-stream press
covered this issue?
· Not hardly.
·
What
is the thought process that feels this Agenda 21 is justified here at home?
·
William
LaJeunesse of Fox News reports: “Agenda 21 and its
supporters around the country and world see as Agenda 21's subtext that the
United States has a history of environmental irresponsibility and needs to
pay for that. Arguing that Americans
have forfeited the rights to manage their own resources because they
embraced urban sprawl, gas guzzling cars and unchecked consumption of
resources, the U.N. says someone has to take over.” Further he reports: quote "The
rate at which we are depleting the environment is so fast, if we actually
hit the crisis we won't be able to put the brakes on and stop," says
Vic Desotelle of the Sustainable Quality Alliance.” End
quote.
·
Is there justification for that
accusation?
·
I suppose if you are a person who rules
their life on emotion rather than fact, then you might deduce that we
Americans are some kind of environmental exploiters. However, there is plenty of “factual”
evidence proving none of that to be the case. Oh yes, we do enjoy our gas guzzling
cars, our homes in the country and we allow ourselves enough water usage
that we bathe once a day rather than once a week. But the Cato
Institute will disagree with Mr. Vic Desotelle and do it with facts
not supposition. In fact, if it
weren’t for our capitalist society, most people of this world would never
have driven a car or flown in an airplane.
·
If that is not the case, environmental
calamity, then why has our government agreed to this scheme?
·
It seems the United States Government has
agreed to the socialistic ideals of the United Nations since George Bush
the first was elected President. He
told us so in his “New World Order” speeches. Then when President Clinton was elected,
that assured eight more years of agreement and a fast track toward our
national alignment with “Sustainable Development” (Agenda 21). Of course let’s not forget Vice
President Gore’s history of environmentalism, socialist leanings and his
book, ‘Earth in the Balance’.
·
How can our government do that? Nobody asked me if I wanted my life ruled
by the United Nations. I don’t
remember voting on that issue. I
never heard the United States Congress debate the issue of us giving up our
sovereignty.
·
I don’t know how they could do what they
did, but they did. Seems the
‘democratic processes’ didn’t apply to this issue. You won’t like this but here it is: (House of Representatives - October 02,
1992) Mr. ENGEL.
- - - Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the concurrent
resolution (H. Con. Res. 353) expressing the sense of the Congress that the
United States should assume a strong leadership role in implementing the
decisions made at the Earth summit by developing a national strategy to
implement Agenda 21 and
other Earth summit agreements through domestic policy and foreign policy,
by cooperating with all countries to identify and initiate further
agreements to protect the global environment, and by supporting and
participating in a high-level U.N. Sustainable Development
Commission, as amended. CLICK
HERE TO READ HR-353 Further: HON. NANCY
PELOSI in the House of Representatives MONDAY, MARCH 29, 1993 Ms. PELOSI. Mr. Speaker, the Earth Summit
provided the world with an unparalleled opportunity to build a global
consensus around critical environmental issues. Implementation of the Earth
Summit agreements is the key to the summit's ultimate success.
·
Last year, the
House passed the Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act, which I
introduced, along with all of the House delegates to the Earth Summit, upon
my return from Rio. Today, I will introduce similar legislation, with 33
original cosponsors, to implement Agenda 21 and Senator
Pell, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will join me in
introducing identical legislation in the Senate.
·
The Earth Summit
Environmental Leadership Act outlines a comprehensive national strategy for
sustainable development, in accordance with the principles of Agenda 21
, to be coordinated under the leadership of a specific office and the
direction of a high-level government official. It also urges the United
States to identify and initiate further agreements to protect the global
environment, and for the President to report to Congress on progress toward
achieving a national strategy to implement Agenda 21
.
·
It is critical
that the United States set an example of sustainable consumption and
production patterns. My legislation outlines a number of steps to attain
this goal, including the elimination or reduction of subsidies for the
exploitation of natural resources, and to design a policy framework for
sustainable consumption patterns.
·
Environmental
protection is not only a national issue; it is a challenge for every
individual to make a difference. The principles embodied in Agenda 21
present a framework for environmental action that should be pursued at all
levels of society--in our schools, local communities, governments, and in
our lifestyles. The concept of sustainable development should be realized
in all the major decisions affecting the future of our environment and the
preservation of its species. The Hopi Indians practiced a land-use policy
based on the 7th generation--that their relationship with the land would
not have adverse effects on future generations of Hopis. We should attempt
to do no less.
·
Senator Pell has
demonstrated a forceful leadership on global environmental issues and I
look forward to working in partnership with him on this important
initiative to achieve sustainable development in the United States.
·
I urge my
colleagues to join me in cosponsoring the Earth Summit Environmental
Leadership Act to continue the progress of the Earth Summit.
·
Okay, our government signed onto Agenda
21 in 1992 but we are still protected by the Constitution, right?
·
What is the Constitution going to do
about HR-353 section(B) which directs: “(B)
The United States Government should encourage and facilitate, at all levels
of community and sectors of society, appropriate means for adopting
individual Agenda 21 plans of action, including the establishment of local,
county, State, business, and other boards and commissions for achieving
sustainable development. Each member of the Congress should help initiate
this process within their States or districts.” End
quote. If people don’t stand up and
demand their rights, it’s over.
·
Yeah but that was a long time ago and a
lot has changed. We have a new
President Bush.
·
True but I’m afraid this President Bush is a “One
World’ guy too. Like father, like
son? Anyway our
current President Bush agrees with Agenda 21 also, as his Under Secretary
of State for Global Affairs, Paula Dobriansky, told a Brookings-Council
on Foreign Relations on Thursday, May 23, 2002 - 12:00 p.m.-1:15 p.m.
at The Washington Club, quote: “But if
Johannesburg is to truly implement the international community's new
consensus, demonstrated in Monterrey, to effectively mobilize resources for
sustainable development, it should produce compelling results, not merely
high sounding rhetoric. We already have agreed upon Agenda 21 and the
Millennium Declaration goals. The world community does not need to
negotiate new goals or create new global bureaucracies.” Further she
stated what we might take as the purpose: “The
essence of the message from the United States — that the United States will
carry to Johannesburg is that we must continue down the path laid out in
Monterrey…”
·
So this country has been wrapped up,
tied with a fancy bow and handed to the America haters at the U.N. by Nancy
Pelosi, and everyone else is in lock step?
·
Well I don’t know about that, but Ms.
Pelosi certainly was one of the first in line to be a “change agent”. Someone who was ready to abandon American
ideals for the UN’s ideals.
·
What was that the other day, where the
Supreme Court ruled against private property rights.
·
Our Founders knew that private property
rights are the foundation of freedom:
James Madison
March 29, 1792 on property:
This term in its
particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and
exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every
other individual."
In its larger and juster
meaning, it embraces everything to which a man may attach a value and have
a right; and which leaves to everyone else the like advantage.
In the former sense, a
man’s land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.
In the latter sense, a
man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.
He has a property of
peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and
practice dictated by them.
He has a property very
dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.
He has an equal property
in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to
employ them.
In a word, as a man is
said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a
property in his rights.
Where an excess of power
prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his
opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions. Read
Property Rights
·
Okay, uncle, uncle. But how can this “Agenda 21” be so bad?
·
You’ve read where the President, by
executive order, instituted “Sustainable Development”. You’ve learned that “Sustainable
Development” and “Agenda 21” are the same thing. You’ve read where the U.S. Congress has
stated “Agenda 21” is the policy of the land. Now there should be no doubt that the
United Nations Agenda 21 is guiding our lives and this country at this very
moment. I give you the Supreme
Court ruling on property rights as proof.
I give you “sustainable communities” across the globe as proof. I give you “Sustainable Sonoma County” as
proof. I give you “Agenda 21 Santa
Cruz” as proof. I give you Florida
as proof. Agenda 21 is not the “Bill
of Rights”. It is not “The
Declaration of Independence”. And it
is not the “U.S. Constitution”. It
has never been decided on by the American people that “Agenda 21” should be
our new bible. Our guiding light
into the 21st century. It
is being pushed on us by a bunch of self righteous elitist. It empowers those who agree and
indoctrinates those who do not. And
you are going to think you are having a bad dream when it comes into your
home.
·
What do we call these (I hate to use
the word people) people doing this to our country?
· Well,
Michael Shaw has spent some time resolving that issue and here’s what he came
up with.
As a
political science major and later as a law student, the definition of, or
nature of a soviet social system was never addressed. But years later when
"stakeholder consensus councils" began to swarm Santa Cruz
County, I began to evaluate the subject in earnest.
I know
that the outcomes are pre-arranged because I attended many of these
"stakeholder" meetings. My perspective always included addressing
the consequence of the planned program on private property and individual
autonomy. Without exception an attempt was made by the paid
"facilitators" to disregard comments like mine.
The
Definition of a Soviet:
· A soviet is a system of
councils that report to an apex council and implement a predetermined
outcome, often by consensus, affecting a region or neighborhood.
· Members of a soviet council are
chosen by virtue of their willingness to comply with that outcome and their
one-mindedness with the group
· Soviets are the operating
mechanism of a government-controlled economy, whether it be socialism or
government-corporate ("public-private") partnerships
Change
agents are working with opportunists and other foolish people by
coordinating government, business, NGO, and "non-profit" partners
to implement a soviet system in your county, too.
Watch Michael
Shaw from Freedom 21. This is a 20 min. video well worth your time.
***
· The very worst thing about “Agenda 21”
is, they are implementing it in an un-American way because it is anti-
American. They know if we the people
were asked to vote on it and ratify it by each state, it would never pass.
· They are all guilty. This is not about being a Democrat or a
Republican it’s about being an American.
Every elected official who is sneaking this past the citizens of
this country is not worthy of calling themselves an American.
· There is no middle road here. You either support implementing Agenda 21
or you oppose implementing Agenda 21.
Which flag is your flag?
AGENDA
21 FREEDOM
21
· You know Agenda 21 has been discussed and
voted on in Congress, so, have your Representative or Senator explain to
you why he never told you about it before.
Have them tell you why they did what they did.
· Make “Agenda 21” an election issue for
your Congressman.
· “Agenda 21” should be a public debate
issue. Let’s bring “Agenda 21” out
of the closet and shine the bright light of scrutiny on the subject so all
Americans know what’s happening.
· To be a Freedom 21 Fighter you don’t have
to join anything. You don’t have to
pay any dues. You don’t have to
attend any meetings. You just have
to learn about Agenda 21 because you can’t fight something you know nothing
about. Then you must share your
knowledge with your friends and neighbors.
And the next time you meet someone who is running for elected
office, any office, ask them where they stand on Agenda 21 “sustainable
development”. Be a Freedom 21
Fighter!
· May GOD Bless the United States of
America.
LINKS:
· Maurice
Strong Architect of Agenda 21
· Local
Agenda 21 – The U.N. Plan for your community
· ICLEI Members
· Henry Lamb @ World Net Daily
· Freedom 21 – Advancing the Principals of Freedom in the 21st
Century
· U. N.
Watch
· The Earth Charter and the Ark of the Gaia Covenant
· Sirolli Institute and Lake County, CA
‘Lake County’s Spirit of Entrepreneurs’
HOME
|
